The Hampstead Children Were Talking about Their Abuse BEFORE Abe Christie Came Along and Put Them on YouTube

I received an email this morning explaining to me that the Hampstead children were talking about their horrific abuse BEFORE Abe Christie came along and that those sessions were taped. This explains WHY these children have been used in this case as they have been, as they were ALREADY letting people know what was happening to them.

This case has been based on this theory that if you don’t trust Ella Gareeva ( the children’s mother) and her repeated ex felon boyfriend Abraham Christie, then you can’t believe the children. But that is silly. Ella has repeatedly said that she wasn’t aware of all of this before Abe, but how do you explain that the children were filmed speaking about their abuse BEFORE that with someone else? And according to my source, which is very reliable, neither Abe nor Ella were present in these discussions. Of course, both the “good side” and the bad side will do what they have constantly been doing and call me a liar but I believe this will backfire when people see the truth. The children were taped and those tapes are evidence that this whole argument that Abe and Ella have presented is a lie. These children were ALREADY talking. Which explains why they are being used as they are in this case. The cult doesn’t want the public to believe these children, and since they were ALREADY talking, they needed to find a way to contain all of this and prevent anyone from believing the children. So they are using the myriad of lies Abe and Ella have told to distract from and discredit the children. When you look at it, it is so easy to see the games being played in all of this and, more importantly, why these games have been so necessary.

Ella Gareeva and Her Involvement with the Cult in Hampstead London

So Ella ( the Hampstead children’ s mother) has an older son James whose father supposedly works for the cult. If this is the case, then Ella can’t feign the ignorance concerning the cult she has, claiming it was her repeated ex felon boyfriend’s three month involvement with her and the children that alerted her to what was going on. But her oldest son James DIRECTLY contradicts this. It is interesting, don’ t you think – that this key piece of information has been left out of the public discourse by both the “good guys” and the bad.

It has been claimed I don’t believe the children. This is false. But they are children. Even though I believe them, I ALSO realize that they are children. And although I do not believe they were coached with regards to their allegations, I can’t negate the fact that they might have been told what NOT to say. It has been pointed out repeatedly that the children said nothing bad about their mom or Abe but the fact is- these two were the ones who filmed the videos and it was Abe who was directing the questions. What child EVER is going to speak out about adults when the adults are standing right there with the children filming them? It is possible the children either DIDN’T KNOW or they were too afraid to say anything. Either way they are children and are certainly not to be considered infallible.

One fact is obvious though concerning Ella’ s oldest son James. She either DID KNOW about the cult previously or she is one of the dumbest people living on planet Earth. Considering that the cult has been involved with this case from it’ s very introduction, it should be considered that Ella OFFERED HER CHILDREN UP TO THIS MESS so that the cult could use this case use to discredit the 19 other cases that directly proceed it and distract from the fact there was a major cover up in the 80′ s concerning the SAME TYPE OF ALLEGATIONS throughout the UK.

This was the post that alerted me to this aspect…

“The children say that James does not like the sex. So what is going on? Is James in the cult or not? Can you be in the cult and not do the sex because you do not like it? He has been living with his father, who is allegedly the financier of a (Luciferian) cult, presumably laundering billions of quid earned from cult activities. Will Draper works for Mirabaud, a private Swiss bank, which would give him the means. According to Hampstead Research, he is a Royal Arch Freemason.

James has just gone to University. He is at Leicester. So he is an adult: is this young man a member of a cult or not? Has he witnessed crimes? He must know about this situation: the fact that he has not spoken out suggests that he is complicit or terrified/intimidated. Neither situation is acceptable nor legal.

James’ Facebook shows a message from Ella’s sister Valeria about his getting into Uni:

james dra[er

So Ella’s family is still talking to James. What, then, is Ella’s family’s relationship to the Drapers? Does her family accept that James’ father is, allegedly a financier to a Luciferian cult? Do they accept that James is, allegedly, either complicit or intimidated?

Such a terrible dilemma for them all. But these questions are worthy of consideration, public scrutiny, even, no matter how distasteful.”

More Distractions Concerning the Hampstead Case

Alan Alanson posted this article this morning to try and discredit me about there never being any SRA convictions in the UK. What I find interesting about this article is that there are NO people who are well connected in this. They are all just individuals acting on their own volition and are in no way connected to a larger group. This shows NOTHING with what is going on with the Hampstead children- and is yet just ANOTHER distraction to prevent anyone from listening to what I am saying regarding this case. But give it a read and judge for yourselves…

https://nathanieljharris.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/satanic-ritual-abuse-u-k-convictions-so-far/

He and his friends have also gone all over Facebook claiming the the tattoos and markings that the children spoke about are also real. I believe this is being used to discredit this case and that they AREN’t real. The children were simply duped to believe they are so this fact could be used to dismiss this case, the 19 others that proceeded it, and the well known fact that the UK has a proven history of covering up this mess back in the 80’s when the same type of allegations came out in the first place. That is why we are seeing this desperate attempt to insist they are real today, after Alan Alanson let it out yesterday that chances are pretty good they AREN’T real.

Alan Alanson Just Clued Me In that the Distinguishing Marks and Tattoos with Concern Regarding the Hampstead Child Abuse Case Aren’t Real

The cult was the one who introduced this case. They have been in control of it from the very beginning. Which is why they duped the 8 and 9 year old children. Because when push comes to shove and they get the authorities to check it out, when they discover these tattoos and markings are false, they will then attempt to use it to discredit the children and everything they say. The cult always has a fail safe in everything they do. This is what they want to use in the end, which is why the “good guys” keep clammoring about this very aspect.

Capturea
CapturebCapturejjjjCapturedCaptureeCapturejCapturehCapturejjCapturejjjCapturejjjjCapturejjjjjCaptureiCaptureiiCaptureiiCaptureiiiiCaptureppCapturepqCaptureqqCaptureqrCaptureqrrCapturestCaptureyCaptureyyCaptureyzCapturezCapturezzCapturexyzCapturexxyzCaptureyzzCapturezzzCaptureyyzzCapturezaCapturezaaCapturezyaCapturezzzzyCapturexyzaaCapturebcCapture334eCapture098

Capture32ewCapture980
newnew2new3new4new5new6new7new8new9new10new11new12new13new14new15

Clinton and Donald Trump with Regards to Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffery Epstein

http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/why-was-bill-clinton-at-child-molesters-private-island-12-times/

Jeffery Epstein- convicted billionaire pedophile- is also DIRECTLY connected with Republican front runner Donald Trump- who has PUBLICLY come out in support of the convicted pedophile billionaire with saying that he is “a great guy” and throws “great parties”. Funny that we now are all starting to understand what make convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffery Epstein’s parties so “great”.

The Games Being Played Concerning the Hampstead Case- A Detailed Explanation

Look, this whole dog and pony show that is going on concerning the Hampstead case in the UK isn’t really all that hard to understand- and when you look at the history of all of this- you will begin to understand this is how the game has ALWAYS been played.

Right now, the royal family is obviously shitting it’s pants considering all of the effort they are going to in trying to shield themselves from this whole elite pedophile child trafficking ring thing that is has come forward in the UK. The UK not only has 19 other cases that directly proceed the Hampstead case concerning two children who have come forward saying that they have been abused in unspeakable ways, but the case of Hollie Gregg as well, the little girl with down syndrome who also spoke of being horrifically abused and miraculously got an STD out of nowhere- along with this whole undisputed situation that top level leaders in the UK are guilty of covering it all up in the first place back in the 80’s, so to claim that there are no valid issues for concern is ridiculous. Also, while the UK was engaging in a cover up concerning child trafficking and abuse, at the exact same time the United States was dealing with 1000’s of exactly the same types of allegations here in the 80’s. This group that the royal family is involved with knows that there is going to be hell to pay when all of this comes out publically- and so they concocted a little plan to try and make this all go away.

They decided to take two REAL victims, the Hampstead children, and get their case out publically. Now understand- they have all been working really hard at trying to get this contained now for about a year to a year in a half- ever since the evidence coming out was making the shit hit the fan with regards to Jimmy Saville. So they send in a repeated ex-felon who is involved in a cannabis campaign and can be easily discredited in a myriad of ways, whenever the need arises. He goes in- films the children, who are HONESTLY speaking about REAL events that they have personally experienced, and then the rest of the group descends as the “good guys” and do all of this bizarre stuff- like releasing names and addresses of supposed cult members from the very start and trying to make it appear that they are trying to start “another moral panic”. Or at least make it seem that way.

Now the bad guys- the ones claiming that the types of abuse that the Hampstead children and so many others all over the place are describing are all lies and just made up in the minds of the victims, are taking the situations they are being given by the “good guys” and using it to discredit the repeated felon boyfriend and his supporters. This is all being done intentionally though. Both sides are working together for the same objective- to make this case out to be the one that dismisses all of the 19 others that precede it. This has been used as a media campaign- and these children- who are VERY REAL SURVIVORS OF HORRIFIC ABUSE, are being used- not by or because of what they said- but because of the people who have associated themselves the closest with this case- esp. on the “good side”- are there to try and discredit the very abuse allegations that these two children have so bravely spoken about in the first place. Hampstead is being made to be another McMartin- which was the preschool case of abuse that was used as a symbol to quiet all of the 1000’s of other cases at the same time concerning the same types of abuse in the US. And this is being done with a concerted effort, with both the “good side” and the bad, to make the issues on the table concerning child trafficking and horrific sex abuse turn into focus instead on personalities, none of whom are directly connected to the real issue at hand- that being that we have come to a point that the 1000’s of cases of horrific child abuse stemming from our elite group of citizens highly connected up in our governments- directly indicate that this group seems be making an awful lot of money doing some pretty outrageous and incredibly detestable things.

Actually- when you think of it honestly- the Hampstead case has evolved in such a way that it isn’t even just about just the two children- 8 and 9- who are being used in this case anymore either. They have transcended into becoming symbolic of what exactly has been going on with all of this for years and, as such, this case is now allowing people to focus honestly, for the 1st time since the 80’s, on the REAL issues concerning this in order to realize that there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with this whole entire situation. As there was the first time the US and the UK dealt with these same allegations in the 80’s. Hampstead gives everyone a place to start- and is showing itself to be a clear example of how these cover-ups have been allowed to flourish with regards to child trafficking and horrific abuse in the first place.

The thing is- this whole make it about personalities so that you can use people to distract from the truth has been used time and time again. A perfect example of this is ex FBI guy Ted Gunderson. Yes, he had a career in the FBI- but Gunderson didn’t really “emerge” on the scene in the public arena until after prosecuting attorney Gary Caradori was killed while investigating events around Franklin Credit in Omaha in the 80’s. He was sent in to be a distraction.

Now here we have this guy who is incredibly questionable- can be easily discredited- who is acting like he is the good guy. Michael Aquino- who is most assuredly being one of the bad guys- goes on the talk show circuit with Gunderson and what everyone sees is a joke. This high up military guy who claims he is a Satanist (which is a lie by the way since he is most ASSUREDLY a Luciferian who loves the thought of an Antichrist), parades around in a Merlin type outfit and Gunderson fumbles around and doesn’t ask any hard questions (which begs the question how he got as far in the FBI as he did) and so everyone watching thinks it is a joke. The thing is this though- what ALSO happens is that anything that you now hear about any of this will make you think of those involved who have made themselves out to be either uncreditable or worse- a joke- and so now you instinctually dismiss EVERYTHING in regards to criminal activity with the association that you have made with the person who is supposedly trying to expose it. It eventually reaches a point in some that they discredit everything that comes out of the person’s mouth. So even if that person is telling you the truth- because of your association that you have with the topic and with the person you heard it from, you will discredit it all and not believe what the person is telling you.

So, like in Ted Gunderson’s case, he could be telling you straight up truth and because we all know what we do about the man, we all have immediately dismissed what he says. In other words- he tells the truth and we come away with believing that the truth is a lie. And this is done intentionally and has been incredibly effective in controlling the narrative that there is an elite group of pedophiles who are Luciferian and believe in the AntiChrist who have been making inordinate amounts of money in the sex and human trafficking of children globally. Just like Ted Gunderson told us- but we didn’t believe him- because he said it, which is what happens when the FACTS get shifted into a focus on PERSONALITIES.

And this was done intentionally and deceptively. Just like how the repeated ex-felon fanatic boyfriend started this whole Hampstead ordeal by filming the two children and posting it on YouTube was done because this group knew that it could be discredited along with the boyfriend and most of their supporters. If they look crazy- that is because it is being made to look that way on purpose. It is a distraction. If you are busy focused on them and their antics- you aren’t focused on the fact that this case is being made out to look the way it does so that it- and ALL OF THE OTHER 19 CASES THAT CAME BEFORE IT- are completely dismissed. Not to mention that the UK has a proven history of doing this before so why on earth would anyone believe that they aren’t doing their best to try and do the same damn thing again?

So excuse me if I stop worrying about all of the blatant lies that are being added to my YouTube station at a rapid rate- and the Facebook campaigns that are trying to discredit me and what I am saying- because NONE OF IT IS ABOUT ME. People are aware now- and they know what to look for. And all of these petty attacks against me in order to try and control the narrative and keep people from looking at the truth of the whole situation are simply not going to work. The jig is up. It is time that people see how this is working- and how it has ALWAYS worked, honestly now. And all of these petty attempts to shift the focus onto me – or anyone else- are not going to work.

___________________________________

People working in conjunction with the bad side have demanded that I post this….

CaptureaCapturebCapturecCapturedCaptureeCaptureiiCaptureiiiiCapturejjCapturejjjCapturejjjjCapturejjjjjCaptureiCaptureiiCaptureiiii

Just What is it About This “Dearman does Hampstead” Website

Different named trolls keep acusing me of being involved in this internet site called ” Dearman does Hampstead”, claiming in fact that I guess I am supposed to be running it. I probably should check it out but I can’t bring myself to go there. The name gives me this kind of the ” Debbie does Dallas” image and knowing how strange this case is and all of the people involved with it, I am scared to look and see what might be on it. One thing is certain though. I am definitely not running it. I just got involved with Hampstead less than 6 weeks ago and even then I was way behind on the learning curve as to who was who in each different case in the beginning. So this idea that i am behind some website connected to the Hampstead case is stupid. Obviously my own site works fine.

Entertainment

(sorry about the spelling errors, which were pointed out by the Hampstead Supporters Spelling Mafia- I did this original post on my phone. Doesn’t change what I said though)

It has been actually facinating- much like watching “reality” television, watching hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com play their games trying to appear that they are trashing repeated ex felon Abe Christie now that it has been shown that they are also on the team supporting him. They actually believe that their games are going to keep focus off what the Hampstead ritually abused children said- which resembles exactly the 19 cases that have proceeded this case and keep it on Abe and his supporters, all of whom are working in league with Hoaxtead directly. I truly believe that they believe that no one is going to see through their clever quips and obvious deceit in trying to make this case out to be another child abuse laden McMartin. However it seems many people are seeing the light which is lifting their unspeakable unease with the facts that have been presented. The game is obvious now as everyone is starting to see how the dialogue surrounding Hampstead is trying to be contained and controlled by both sides. Again, it has nothing to do with me or any one individual but a concerted group who is working in conjunction with both sides in a desperate attempt to make all of this go away. Not gonna work but now that everyone sees it, I have to admit is is fascinating to watch.

A Facebook Post Dealing with Those Claiming Fiona Barnett and I, David Shurter, Are Disinfo Agents

Lol the Hampstead case is whining about being victims. They post horrible homophobic pro Hitler nonsense and then when they get caught, they all claim they were set up and are not responsible for what they said. Fiona Barnett and i, David Shurter, have shown that the ” good guys” are working directly with the bad guys in order to discredit and control the narrative about this case and now they are clamoring that we are disinfo agents, never ONCE dealing with the evidence at hand. They all seem to be working in conjunction with each other claiming that Fiona and i laid in wait for the Hampstead children to first be born, then be abused, then for the case to come along so we could discredit it. Nothing Fiona and i have done or said in the decade + we have been working to expose all of this crap matters- the ONLY thing that matters is the Hampstead case, which is being used to try and dismiss EVERY OTHER ALLEGED CRIME THAT HAS COME BEFORE IT. this group is just mad this isn’t happening and so they are using the only card they have left by claiming Fiona and i are disinfo. It is sad really. And anyone with a discerning eye who looks at all of this can easily see what they are trying to do.

With Regards to the Allegations that I, David Shurter, or Fiona Barnett- Are Disinfo Agents With Concerns about Our Work Concerning an Elite Luciferian Child Trafficking Cult

First off, I have no intentions of playing games. I never made a video with anyone- and the only person I have been involved with in filming anything is with a friend of mine and no one else. This weird attempt to try and make me out to be a disinfo agent is ridiculous- and it not going to work. I have been focused and active at exposing this whole mess for far too long, and have been to outspoken for far too long- way longer than the Hampstead children have even been alive, to say that I am playing for the other side. This whole idea is being fueled by a group of Hampstead supporters with the heavy direction of Sonya Vangelder.

I may have been at this for well over a decade- but Sonya Vangelder definitely has not. She has been in this for only a year. And yet she is another one who is trying to claim that she is now an expert- while doing her best to try and trash other survivors- such as Fiona Barnett, who is actually making a difference with exposing Australia’s mess concerning the same types of allegations there. Now there are reasons why Sonya is focused on Fiona- and I would like to take an opportunity to explain why.

Fiona lives in Australia and has been working diligently- for even longer than myself- to expose this elite Luciferian child pedophile trafficking ring that is happening down under. Fiona has made amazing progress and has really begun to make a significant difference with regards to all of this. But it seems Sonya is ALSO from Australia. She, by her own admission, has only been at this for about a year- and yet she is claiming she is an expert at the same time she is now trying to trash Fiona- who is finally making a difference. She has somehow ingratiated herself into the survivor community- and for some reason- there are some who are giving her more credibility to her short time investigation than to survivors who have a proven record of trying to expose this for well over a decade or more. Considering Austrailia, like the UK and the US, have shown themselves to be desperate to silence this information about an organized Luciferian child sex trafficking ring, I believe that Sonya is yet another disinfo agent sent in to try and control all of this- but the Australian version. However- since Fiona and I joined forces- and I am focused on Hampstead- now Sonya has become focused on Hampstead. Why? Because it is her job to do her best to try and prevent anyone from listening to Fiona- and now me- but really, anyone who is trying to expose this elite Luciferian child sex ring. She is just another agent involved in trying to contain all of this.

Sonya came on Facebook and did her best to try and subtly discredit me. When it didn’t work- she sent Fiona messages on Facebook two days later- complete with a highly triggering email about snuff films with some incredibly graphic pictures involved. This was done for one of two reasons as I can see- it was either meant as a threat to Fiona- or an attempt to trigger her. Either way- it was intended to shut her down and to make her stop talking. Afterwards- when Fiona decided to block her- this same Sonya and her supporters have gone out of their way to try and make Fiona appear nefarious by attempting to discredit her by claiming that she is a disinfo agent. Exactly the same thing they are now trying to say about me. All of this is just a feeble attempt to prevent people from listening to us. Again- it isn’t going to work- but that doesn’t mean that the game still isn’t being played.

I have undisputedly shown that the “good guys” in Hampstead are working in direct conjunction with the bad guys- and that, as far as personalities go, the “good guys” are just as bad with their homophobic pro Hitler beliefs as the Luciferians they are supposedly going against. Instead of dealing with this fact- which indicates that my belief is correct that Hampstead is attempting to be used to create another case like McMartin which happened here in the US in order to try and dismiss the 19 previous cases of abuse that they currently have and the undisputable fact that the UK went through a HUGE cover-up concerning the very same types of allegations in the 80s- now this collection of con artists are either publically announcing on their Hoaxtead Research website that they are “ignoring” me- claiming that they are not going to feed my supposed need for attention any longer while those who are claiming to be working on the good side are spouting that I am a disinfo agent who has planned- for at least 12 years now, that I was going to infiltrate the Hampstead case. But however ridiculous these arguments become- I need to point out that this evidence is not ABOUT me, but rather are about the fact that there is now proof that another cover up is being attempted with the Hampstead case and to make it out about anything or anyone else is nothing but a deliberate distraction from the truth. And since evidence shows that a myriad of cover ups are currently taking place, esp with the Hampstead case, claiming otherwise is indicative that the person speaking is not playing on the right side and/or is actively involved with trying to cover up these allegations.

Fiona has released indisputable facts concerning this luciferian child trafficking group of elites situation in Austrailia- which is why the perp she called out- Nichole Kidman’s father Anthony Kidman- “committed suicide”. Sonya Vangelder may claim that she didn’t mean anything nefarious sending Fiona the article with a plethora of images of dead chopped up bodies within it but her campaign to discredit Fiona after Fiona blocked her indicates otherwise. This whole business has so many people involved who are posing as good guys but are actually bad guys in order to keep it under wraps that it is amazing- and Soyna- by her own actions- has shown herself to be opposite of what she claims. In fact is seems incredibly apparent that she and her group are doing their best to discredit and control the narrative concerning all of this. The whole you will know a tree by the fruits it bears comes to mind.

However- like I said in the beginning- I am not going to be distracted by these pathetic games. The jig is up- and there is more than enough evidence to indicate that all of this needs a looking into and can no longer be dismissed as it always has been in the past. With 19 cases, one involving Hollie Gregg who is a down syndrome child who claimed ritual abuse and miraculously caught an STD, and the proven historic cover up in the UK-all of this has evolved in such a way that it is NO LONGER about specific individuals but more about a PATTERN of extreme abuse that is occurring in the system- which in and of itself is reason for concern. Therefore- it isn’t about Fiona and it is also certainly NOT ABOUT ME. It is about the fact that case after case after case keep coming out with allegations that a Luciferian AntiChrist loving, demon worshiping, sex depraved, pedophile child killing group is hurting children and making tons of money in the process. Just like what happened in the US in the 80’s, with the same types of allegations, that happened at the exact same time that a proven cover up happened in the UK with, again, the same types of allegations. Just like what is coming out about Australia- involving the exact same types of allegations. The evidence of wrong doing is overwhelming, which is why there is such a squawking about those like Fiona and I, who both are directly involved with pointing all this mess out.