Sometimes, in a game, it takes a while to figure out the strategy of your opponent, and concerning the case of Jerry Sandusky, I have to say that future pedophiles are cheering right now.
It was a brilliant move. Take an old, famous, well liked football hero of sorts, connect him solely to the child abuse at Penn State and his children’s foundation, find him guilty and then sentence him to only 30-60 years. Yes, it is true that he will probably never see the light of free ground again in his lifetime, but it is setting precedence for future cases to argue such a light sentence- esp. given the famous life and name connected in the media with Sandusky. One would think anyway.
However, John DeCamp is correct when he states that Penn State and Franklin Credit are connected- and that is that it is the same people getting rich from the same activity concerning the prostitution of boys, and more than likely- since Sandusky was connected to many of the people who revolved around the real Franklin case, as was Joe Paterno- associating with the same people at the same functions where men who were are known to have been doing the same exact thing here in Omaha says something I think. I don’t know- it is the same deal- and the same cover up- it is just that Penn State isn’t thirty years old.
Knowing what I know about Omaha, it is hard not to become cynical and think that things are going to turn out the same way- like when they convicted Larry King and sentenced him to prison on the bilking of the credit union, although NO charges concerning children of any sort were ever brought against him, let alone anyone else who was connected to the mess, and let me assure you- those connections were and obviously still are pretty vast. What I am trying to say is that Sandusky is being used as a scapegoat to cover up a much bigger issue at Penn State and the children’s foundation just like Larry King was used as a scapegoat to get the heat off of the REAL people involved in the mess here in Omaha that was prevalent from the 50’s to the early 90’s. (At least that is what I know from my family’s involvement- although it could extent back much farther than that).
I have had a smear campaign going on behind the scenes and I have been asked why I continue when it seems that no one can win the kind of fight that I am waging- but I am saying that there are some incredibly rich men connected to a child abduction ring here in Omaha and I would assume that since we just had a problem with Penn State that it is quite possible that old habits die hard. What I am facing is incredible- and so well-orchestrated that I have no idea who is truly behind it. But the truth is worth fighting for- and I believe, again, just like Mr. John DeCamp- that Penn State and Franklin could TRULY be connected, which tells me that what I went through as a child didn’t stop- but rather moved and grew in complexity, like a disease. Children are at stake here- so I fight for this cause, even though I am a gay man who doesn’t much care to be around kids. I say that because if I can get off my behind and get involved, I don’t see why others can’t as well. It is simply the right thing to do.
SENT TO ME THE MORNING AFTER I PUBLISHED THIS ARTICLE
Here’s one connection: As the Franklin thing was at it’s climax, University of Nebraska (that’s right, the Cornhuskers) President Ronald Roskens was quietly dismissed for having parties with underaged males at his University residence. It can be assumed that pedophilia was occuring and privately noted by those who fired him. Naturally, after being dismissed for having pedophilic relations with underaged males while President of an academic institution in “conservative” Nebraska, he was immediately given a high level position in the cabinet of then “conservative” President GHW Bush!
He was replaced by Graham Spanier, who we can assume was brought in to quiet things down. During his tenure at UNL, Spanier was also Chairman of the Board of the Christian Children’s Fund – the largest child sponsorship program in the world. (As we’ve seen with celebrities and others, international child sponsorship provides a great cover for Intelligence activity and worse…..) This program became embroiled in controversy because there were countless instances of fraud, theft, and mismanagement. (reading between the lines, I suspect extreme embezzlement, money laundering, and child trafficking – as we’ve seen with Halliburton, DynCorp, and the UN, to name a few) This corruption was suppressed in a typically nasty fashion, and Spanier moved on, unscathed, to Penn State University.
Now, many are well aware that Penn State has been long involved with MKULTRA, particularly the University hospital. There has also recently been a scandal involving Hershey’s (there is a long, twisted tale behind Hershey’s money which leads to an unrelated MKULTRA story, but that would be inappropriate here), former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge, and an orphanage which all ties back to the Penn State scandal. I imagine that Jesuit Knight of Malta Rick Santorum who once slept with his dead fetus on Aleister Crowley’s birthday (October 12th, lock up your children!) is balls deep in this thing as well.
To get back to the point, Spanier spent years and years prior to his time at UNL at various positions within the MKULTRA hotbed known as Penn State University hospital. He also fronted for many many international corporations, charities, and other big money organizations. He also, still, maintains a very high security clearance with the US government.
So here you have a man quite obviously working for the CIA as a front man for very high level money laundering and pedophilic operations who was brought in to calm the waters at the University of Nebraska when another pedophile was dismissed and then went on to Penn State where he covered up another massive case of pedophilia. The media would like you to believe that ALL of these extremely high level influental people including an icon like Joe Paterno were willing to do everything and risk everything to cover up for one football coach who raped a few kids????????
I call bullshit and I contend that, like Mr. Shurter says, Sandusky is merely a whipping boy in a somewhat tightly controlled scandal which is obviously about something much much bigger and directly ties to the same characters who were involved in the Franklin thing. Too big to fail, they might say…………………..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1DHgA5EaWU
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/11/15/the-1994-christian-childrens-fund-scandal/