1st Comment:

“I agree with much that TimeTheMiddleClassRanThisShow says.

I’ve been around long enough to know a con when I see one; and I have enough conscience to acknowledge a con and not just know one. Dr. Loftus’ psychology is just bold-flavored BS all the way through it. Please consider the very title of this article: ‘Trust your memory? Maybe you shouldn’t’. Okay, a little advance psychology for those who may not yet know: a doctor or researcher who really is looking for the truth never sows doubt. A researcher who is sowing doubt is not trustworthy. There are many things that are unique about truth: one of those is that truth never hides itself (rather, people and things and circumstances hide truth); another is that truth has a way of surfacing with evidence. Real false memories are not detailed and are never recalled the same way as real memories are nor do they continually provoke the same types of emotions nor do they ever corroborate across witnesses who don’t know each other, etc. In light of ‘the truth about truth’, why does a researcher have to cast doubt in order to get to the truth?

Dr. Loftus’ research is so overshadowed by doubts, lies, and half-truths that I wish I could have a sit down talk with her face to face… sort of like I feel about Obama (sorry, Mr. President). Some people lie so much that it would be a delight for me to sit with them and ask them questions that force them to finally spit up the truth or lash out at me. So far, it has been the lashing out or going completely quiet. I think I should write a book on psychology, trauma, and memories called ‘The Truth About Truth’. The more we know how truth itself works, the less likely we are to believe bought and paid-for (or confused) ‘researchers’ like Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Give me a crack at this lady, and all her research that began before I was born will be exposed for the total and absolute bag of ‘true lies’ quackery that it is.”

2nd Comment:

“Time, I totally agree with you. In a court of Law, there are two ways an attorney seeks to win a case: he either uses sentimentality, or he uses facts. I saw a case where a woman who was guilty got off because her attorney used sentimentality to win the jury over. The case was re-tried, because the evidence against the woman was pretty massive forensically. This time, the prosecuting attorney decided to use facts: forensic evidence. And this time, the case turned in his favor, because the forensic evidence told the facts. In the same way, Dr. Lofty Thoughts Loftus may sound good on the emotional level where manipulation (and hypnosis, which she indirectly acknowledged using on test subjects to change their memories) work; but when her ‘findings’ are subjected to ‘forensic findings’ or factual evidence that has nothing to do with emotions, they will definitely surface all the lies hiding in them, and Dr. Lofty Thoughts Loftus will be exposed as the complete FRAUD that she is as a quack psychologist.

I personally believe that you can trick some people with all the psycho-babble (which makes you sound like you’re smarter than they are); but some of us just want the facts in English. Her talk is nonsense and double-speak; she uses ‘shotgun phrases’ that constrict (rather than encourage or mobilize) the mind’s ability to think, reason, and make its own assessments and judgments. Rather, her speak seeks to plant doubt more than truth in the mind (as she seems so good at doing). That alone exposes Lofty Thoughts Loftus as a complete fake besides her testimony against corroborated stories by people who didn’t know each other’s stories.”

The two underlying problems, as far as human nature goes, as to why people don’t look at these issues and pursue them like you are doing are 1.) a lack of natural affection or love, and 2.) a lack of courage. Love often promotes courage; they tend to work together. But they are the two missing ingredients. While they continue to be missing in action, people like you can only continue to do what you’re doing which is to continue to publish, broadcast, and make known the truth until perhaps the facts catch somehow and a revolution comes that will change people’s hearts– i.e. change people from the inside out, the kind of change that lasts and that really matters. I wish you the best on your continued work.

GOD BLESS YOU AND ALL OTHER VICTIMS..

I recently joined franklinfiles as I thought they were reporting on the main issues. What I did note at once on the site is that there isn’t much eagerness to face these issues head on, and since I haven’t read much on the site, I can only wonder what the site is for. Maybe I should do more reading today.

Debbie Nathan’s book, which I hear denies DID (?), and her stance on pedophilia are sad. The bolder these people get, the more comforting it is to have people like you on this side.